Sowing Seeds: The economy is irrelevant
Average Reading Time: about 2 minutes.
Sowing Seeds is a 4-part series about investing. It’s based on having studied several successful value investors with a strong bias toward treating equities as partial business ownership and not as lottery tickets.
First: Part 1, Market value is imaginary
Then: Part 2, The economy is irrelevant
Finally: Part 3, The second best buzz
Bonus: Part 4, Water your own tree, slowly
“But, but… what about the economy? What if my business gets ruined by factors beyond my control?”
Don’t worry. It can’t happen. If your business tanks, it’s your fault.
Good times and hard times will be had by all, but businesses don’t get ruined by the economy. They get ruined by unprepared people making foolish decisions: too small a gross margin, not a tight enough control on expenses, over-leveraged, over-optimistic, over-confident, over-staffed, etc. And these decisions usually get made in good times, leaving companies unprepared for the bad.
Armchair investing
When there is a common, widespread decline, the theorists come out in droves (just as they do when things are unjustifyingly up) and say how theories A, B and C are the cause for the whole mess. Right now it’s a credit crunch due to consumers over-leveraging (assisted by banks) and not having enough to cover the loans. For those banks that are in the thick of it, their stock price has plummeted. For those banks that treated the sub-prime trend with caution, their stock prices are down too. But is the decline in the latter decline?
It’s a business, not a casino
The common error is to think that a stock price is a reflection of day-to-day operations of a business. For the most part it has nothing to do with it. The stock market in the short-term is a popularity contest, not a barometer of financial health. Sure, financial factors influence the stock price, but that affect happens largely in the mind of the day traders and profit-takers, not in the business itself.
I own and run my own business. If someone comes to me tomorrow and offers me $1, then the next day $2, then the next day $1.75, then the next day $0.50, should I panic on the fourth day because the public opinion of my business had once doubled, but now halved? Should the daily manic-depressive offers change how I run my business? Of course not. It’s all imaginary.
Clones or fingerprints?
Taking comfort or pain from macro-economics and believing it is based on scientific truth is the equivalent of judging everyone you know based on someone’s theory of human nature. To be sure, there are qualities amongst us all, and trends and habits that we as humans all share. But to chalk up all of humanity to one theory is simplistic and naive. So it goes with economic theory. One broad-sweeping analysis of an industry, a country or the world cannot capture the individual idiosyncrasies of any one business.
And there’s the rub. What great businesses are out there, still doing fine, but have been unjustly de-valued by the fearful and panic-stricken mob? What publicly traded company, at no risk of disappearing, is selling at a substantial discount to its intrinsic value?
